🔗 Share this article

Protesters gathered outside the legislative building this week

Latvia's parliament members have decided to withdraw from an international accord designed to protect women from abuse, including family violence, following extensive and intense discussions in the parliament.

Thousands of demonstrators assembled in the capital this past week to voice disagreement with the vote. The final authority now lies with President the nation's president, who must determine whether to endorse or reject the proposed law.

Referred to as the European treaty, the international accord only took effect in Latvia last year, mandating authorities to develop laws and assistance programs to eliminate all forms of abuse.

Latvia has become the initial EU country to begin the procedure of withdrawing from the convention. Turkey withdrew in two years ago, a decision that human rights organizations described as a significant regression for gender equality.

Political Debate and Resistance

The treaty was ratified by the EU in 2023, yet conservative factions have argued that its emphasis on equal rights undermines family values and advances what they term "non-traditional gender concepts".

Following a thirteen-hour discussion in the Saeima, MPs decided 56 to 32 to exit from the convention, a move sponsored by political opponents but supported by representatives from one of the three governing partners.

The result represents a defeat for moderate conservative government leader Evika Silina, who stood with protesters outside parliament earlier this week. "We will not surrender, we will continue fighting so that abuse does not triumph," she stated to the assembly.

Political Divisions and Responses

One of the primary parties supporting the exit is a nationalist party, whose head has called on the public to choose between what he terms a "natural family" and "non-binary concepts with various gender identities".

Latvia's human rights commissioner the rights official urged the treaty not to be made political, while the group Equality Now asserted it was "not a threat to Latvian values, it served as a tool to achieve them".

The Thursday's vote has sparked broad protest both inside Latvia and abroad.

Twenty-two thousand people have endorsed a national petition demanding the convention to be maintained. The women's rights organization Centrs Marta has called a protest for next Thursday, charging MPs of disregarding the wishes of the Latvian people.

Global Concerns and Potential Next Steps

The head of the European organization's parliamentary assembly stated that Latvia had made a rash decision driven by false information. He described it as an "never-before-seen and deeply concerning step backward for women's rights and human rights in the continent".

He noted that since the transcontinental nation left the convention in 2021, instances of gender-based killings and violence against women had risen sharply.

Because the decision did not achieve a two-thirds support, the head of state could potentially send back the legislation for further consideration if he holds concerns.

President the national leader stated on digital platforms that he would evaluate the vote according to constitutional principles, "taking into account governmental and judicial considerations, rather than belief-based viewpoints".

Recently, another member of the governing alliance, the reformist party, indicated it would not exclude petitioning to the Constitutional Court.

"This decision represents a worrisome situation for women's rights not only in Latvia but throughout Europe," stated a human rights activist.

• Family violence rates have been increasing in several EU nations
• The European treaty requires specific safeguards for survivors of gender-based violence
• Latvia's vote could affect similar discussions in other member states